|
|
Post by Sonata on Dec 9, 2003 16:04:06 GMT -5
what do people think of these cars? which ones better?
|
|
|
|
Post by Brian Gluckman on Dec 9, 2003 16:15:11 GMT -5
Amanti. Sophistication and features (and safety etc.)
that the XG could never reach.
well done Kia!
|
|
|
|
Post by Sonata on Dec 9, 2003 16:17:15 GMT -5
i generally agree, but i dont like the rounded c-pillar (a la towne car) or the styling of the front grille
|
|
|
|
Post by Brian Gluckman on Dec 9, 2003 16:21:28 GMT -5
couldnt agree more. tho in person it really is breathtaking. the rear view is nice in real life... just beautiful... the rounded C-pillar gives good rear headroom.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sonata on Dec 9, 2003 16:28:48 GMT -5
i havent been in the car, but frum pix the interior looks well bilt- on the outside l like the tailight styling
|
|
|
|
Post by Brian Gluckman on Dec 30, 2003 21:20:36 GMT -5
Chrome rings are a nice taillight touch. ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by a on Mar 28, 2004 3:19:49 GMT -5
amanti is luxury better than XG in korea
|
|
|
|
Post by Admiral on Mar 28, 2004 10:08:43 GMT -5
See my comments/opinions vs XG under "Kia Amanti Review" thread.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sonata on Apr 2, 2004 17:02:13 GMT -5
they both need more powerful engines, tho
|
|
|
|
Post by Brian Gluckman on Apr 2, 2004 19:26:35 GMT -5
I beg to differ. As much as it would be nice, neither are supposed to be enthusiast sporty cars.
Anyways, the XG has good go, though. Today I read a review in my local newspaper stating that when u push the gas, it surges forward as if turbocharged.
Too bad it isnt calibrated otherwise to be completely sporty.
|
|
